7.14 Oral Examiner Evaluation Form – eata handbook

European Association for Transactional Analysis
EATA Training and Examinations Handbook

Search

This manual contains all the information regarding the requirements/rules/forms, and guidelines related to TA training and TA examinations in all four fields.

EATA Handbook — Forms

Section 1

Section 2

The Four Fields of Specialisation

Section 3

Status of Training

Section 4

EATA Training Contracts

4.1 CTA Training Contract 4.2 CTA TS Contract Form 4.3 TSTA Contract 4.4 Change in Principal Supervisor 4.5 Exception Documentation Checklist 4.6 Expansions Documentation Checklist 4.7 Expression of Needs Form

Section 5

Ethical Code and Professional Practice Guidelines and Ethics Committee

Section 6

The TA 101 Course

6.1 TA 101 Certificate Form 6.2 Endorsement for TA101-Instructor 6.3 CTA101 Instructor Annual Summary Report

Section 7

7.1 Principal Supervisor’s Endorsement of Written Exam 7.2 Candidate’s Submission of the Written Exam 7.3 Application for CTA Oral Examination 7.4 Registration Certificate CTA Oral Exam 7.5 Procedures for CTA Oral Examination 7.6 Letter to the Evaluator 7.8 Letter with Assessment(s) 7.9 Counselling Scoring Sheet 7.10 Educational TA Scoring Sheet 7.11 Organisational TA Scoring Sheet 7.12 TA Psychotherapy Evaluation Form 7.13 Written Examiner Evaluation Form 7.14 Oral Examiner Evaluation Form 7.15 Candidate’s Declaration of No Plagiarism

Section 8

CTA Written Exam

Section 8A

CTA Pragmatic Case Study

Section 9

The CTA Oral Exam

9.1 Application for Appeal of Examination

Section 10

Training Endorsement Workshop

10.1 TEW Registration Form 10.2 Endorsement Letter for TEW 10.3 TEW Self-Evaluation 10.4 TEW Final Feedback Form 10.5 TEW Staff Evaluation Form 10.6 TEW Bursary Form 10.A The TPO Questions 10.B Chart — Evaluation of TPO 10.C Time Structure for Teaching 10.D Feedback on TEW Teaching 10.E Feedback on TEW Supervision

Section 11

The CTA TS Examination

11.1 PCTA TS Annual Summary Report 11.2 CTA TS PS Annual Summary Report 11.3 Application for CTA Trainer Oral Exam 11.4 PS Certification to CTA TS Oral Exam 11.5 Confirmation Letter CTA TS Oral Exam 11.6 Ethics, Theory & Organisation Scoring Sheet 11.7 Teaching Board Scoring Sheet 11.8 Supervision Scoring Sheet

Section 12

The TSTA Examination

12.1 TA 101 Topics for TTA Exam 12.1A Teaching Blended Form — Observer Declaration 12.2 PTSTA Annual Summary Report 12.3 Principal Supervisor Annual Summary Report 12.4 TSTA Examination Application Form 12.5 PS Certification to TSTA Examination 12.5a Confirmation Letter for TSTA Exam 12.6 Theory, Organisation & Ethics Scoring Sheet 12.7 Teaching Board Scoring Sheet 12.8 Supervision Board Scoring Sheet 12.9 Certification for TSTA Exam

Section 13

All Forms

Section 4

4.1 CTA Training Contract 4.2 CTA TS Contract Form 4.3 TSTA Contract 4.4 Change in Principal Supervisor 4.5 Exception Documentation Checklist 4.6 Expansions Documentation Checklist 4.7 Expression of Needs Form

Section 6

6.1 TA 101 Certificate Form 6.2 Endorsement for TA101-Instructor 6.3 CTA101 Instructor Annual Summary Report

Section 7

7.1 Principal Supervisor’s Endorsement of Written Exam 7.2 Candidate’s Submission of the Written Exam 7.3 Application for CTA Oral Examination 7.4 Registration Certificate CTA Oral Exam 7.5 Procedures for CTA Oral Examination

Section 7 (cont.)

7.6 Letter to the Evaluator 7.8 Letter with Assessment(s) 7.9 Counselling Scoring Sheet 7.10 Educational TA Scoring Sheet 7.11 Organisational TA Scoring Sheet 7.12 TA Psychotherapy Evaluation Form 7.13 Written Examiner Evaluation Form 7.14 Oral Examiner Evaluation Form 7.15 Candidate’s Declaration of No Plagiarism

Section 9

9.1 Application for Appeal of Examination

Section 10

10.1 TEW Registration Form 10.2 Endorsement Letter for TEW 10.3 TEW Self-Evaluation 10.4 TEW Final Feedback Form 10.5 TEW Staff Evaluation Form 10.6 TEW Bursary Form

Section 10 (cont.)

10.A The TPO Questions 10.B Chart — Evaluation of TPO 10.C Time Structure for Teaching 10.D Feedback on TEW Teaching 10.E Feedback on TEW Supervision

Section 11

11.1 PCTA TS Annual Summary Report 11.2 CTA TS PS Annual Summary Report 11.3 Application for CTA Trainer Oral Exam 11.4 PS Certification to CTA TS Oral Exam 11.5 Confirmation Letter CTA TS Oral Exam 11.6 Ethics, Theory & Organisation Scoring Sheet 11.7 Teaching Board Scoring Sheet 11.8 Supervision Scoring Sheet

Section 12

12.1 TA 101 Topics for TTA Exam 12.1A Teaching Blended Form — Observer Declaration 12.2 PTSTA Annual Summary Report 12.3 Principal Supervisor Annual Summary Report 12.4 TSTA Examination Application Form 12.5 PS Certification to TSTA Examination 12.5a Confirmation Letter for TSTA Exam 12.6 Theory, Organisation & Ethics Scoring Sheet 12.7 Teaching Board Scoring Sheet 12.8 Supervision Board Scoring Sheet 12.9 Certification for TSTA Exam

Search

This manual contains all the information regarding the requirements/rules/forms, and guidelines related to TA training and TA examinations in all four fields.

This handbook is divided into 13 Sections as follows:

1. INTRODUCTION
2. THE FOUR FIELDS OF SPECIALIZATION
3. STATUS OF TRAINING
4. EATA TRAINING CONTRACTS
5. ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
6. THE TA 101 INTRODUCTORY COURSE
7. THE EXAM REGULATION AND TIMETABLE
8. THE CTA WRITTEN EXAMINATION
8.A The CTA Written Examination Pragmatic Research Case Study
9. THE CTA ORAL EXAMINATION
10. THE TRAINING ENDORSEMENT WORKSHOP
11. THE CTA TS EXAMINATION
12. THE TSTA EXAMINATION
13. ALL FORMS

07.14 Oral Examiner Evaluation Form

7.14 Oral Examiner Evaluation Form

(Former 13.7.14)

EATA Training and Examinations Handbook Updated Apr. 2025 | European Association for Transactional Analysis

Directions: Please rate each examiner and the chairperson of your exam board, using the rating scale shown in bold below. Your evaluation will help in the process of creating superior examination boards.

RATING SCALE: The examiner’s skills in this area were perceived as:

5 – highly developed
4 – good on the whole
3 – satisfactory on the whole
2 – unsatisfactory on the whole
1 – poor

Directions: Please rate each examiner and the chairperson of your exam board, using the rating scale shown in bold below, and return the completed form to the supervisor of the examinations. Thank you for completing this form.

Your evaluation will help in the process of creating superior examination boards.

Full Name

Date

Chair of this Board Full Name

Exam Supervisor Full Name

RATING SCALE: The examiner’s skills in this area were perceived as

5 – highly developed / 4 – good on the whole / 3 – satisfactory on the whole / 2 – unsatisfactory / 1 – poor

Examiners names >

Examiner 1

Examiner 2

Examiner 3

Examiner 4

A. Questions were clear and precise

A.1

1 – poor2 – unsatisfactory3 – satisfactory on the whole4 – good on the whole5 – highly developed

A.2

1 – poor2 – unsatisfactory3 – satisfactory on the whole4 – good on the whole5 – highly developed

A.3

1 – poor2 – unsatisfactory3 – satisfactory on the whole4 – good on the whole5 – highly developed

A.4

1 – poor2 – unsatisfactory3 – satisfactory on the whole4 – good on the whole5 – highly developed

B. Questions were fair, relevant and appropriate for the knowledge and skills required by a CTA/CTA TS/TSTA

B.1

1 – poor2 – unsatisfactory3 – satisfactory on the whole4 – good on the whole5 – highly developed

B.2

1 – poor2 – unsatisfactory3 – satisfactory on the whole4 – good on the whole5 – highly developed

B.3

1 – poor2 – unsatisfactory3 – satisfactory on the whole4 – good on the whole5 – highly developed

B.4

1 – poor2 – unsatisfactory3 – satisfactory on the whole4 – good on the whole5 – highly developed

C. The examiner offered the candidate the opportunity and the space to state his/her reasons and thinking and to defend his/her/their position

C.1

1 – poor2 – unsatisfactory3 – satisfactory on the whole4 – good on the whole5 – highly developed

C.2

1 – poor2 – unsatisfactory3 – satisfactory on the whole4 – good on the whole5 – highly developed

C.3

1 – poor2 – unsatisfactory3 – satisfactory on the whole4 – good on the whole5 – highly developed

C.4

1 – poor2 – unsatisfactory3 – satisfactory on the whole4 – good on the whole5 – highly developed

D. The examiner offered the candidate the opportunity and the space to state his/her reasons and thinking and to defend his/her/their position

D.1

1 – poor2 – unsatisfactory3 – satisfactory on the whole4 – good on the whole5 – highly developed

D.2

1 – poor2 – unsatisfactory3 – satisfactory on the whole4 – good on the whole5 – highly developed

D.3

1 – poor2 – unsatisfactory3 – satisfactory on the whole4 – good on the whole5 – highly developed

D.4

1 – poor2 – unsatisfactory3 – satisfactory on the whole4 – good on the whole5 – highly developed

E. The examiner made an effort to find the candidate’s strengths

E.1

1 – poor2 – unsatisfactory3 – satisfactory on the whole4 – good on the whole5 – highly developed

E.2

1 – poor2 – unsatisfactory3 – satisfactory on the whole4 – good on the whole5 – highly developed

E.3

1 – poor2 – unsatisfactory3 – satisfactory on the whole4 – good on the whole5 – highly developed

E.4

1 – poor2 – unsatisfactory3 – satisfactory on the whole4 – good on the whole5 – highly developed

F. The examiner made an effort to find the candidate’s strengths

F.1

1 – poor2 – unsatisfactory3 – satisfactory on the whole4 – good on the whole5 – highly developed

F.2

1 – poor2 – unsatisfactory3 – satisfactory on the whole4 – good on the whole5 – highly developed

F.3

1 – poor2 – unsatisfactory3 – satisfactory on the whole4 – good on the whole5 – highly developed

F.4

1 – poor2 – unsatisfactory3 – satisfactory on the whole4 – good on the whole5 – highly developed

The chairperson stayed in charge of the examination process and kept it moving along

1 – poor2 – unsatisfactory3 – satisfactory on the whole4 – good on the whole5 – highly developed

The chairperson structured the examination clearly

1 – poor2 – unsatisfactory3 – satisfactory on the whole4 – good on the whole5 – highly developed

The chairperson dealt with problems effectively as they came up

1 – poor2 – unsatisfactory3 – satisfactory on the whole4 – good on the whole5 – highly developed

The chairperson helped to create a comfortable atmosphere, allowing the candidate to show his/her/their level of competence

1 – poor2 – unsatisfactory3 – satisfactory on the whole4 – good on the whole5 – highly developed

Please add specific comments

This manual contains all the information regarding the requirements/rules/forms, and guidelines related to TA training and TA examinations in all four fields.

EATA FORMER LOGO

European Association for Transactional Analysis
Silvanerweg 8. 78464 Konstanz. GERMANY
Tel: +49-7531-955190

↑