1 –

Can hardly articulate and discuss a coherent personal and contextual vision as an O.D. consultant, with little linking to TA philosophy

.

2 –

3 –

Articulates and discusses some personal and contextual vision as an O.D. consultant, showing some links to TA philosophy

.

4 –

5 –

Articulates and discusses coherent personal and contextual vision as an O.D. consultant, congruent with TA

.

1 –

Awareness of historical, cultural, social perspectives and the learning within the organization is vague or invisible

.

2 –

3 –

Shows some awareness of historical, cultural, social perspectives and demonstrates some learning in the organization

4 –

5 –

Demonstrates accounting for historical, cultural, social perspectives and actively facilitates learning within the organization

.

1 –

Demonstrates no adequate assessment of the client system and only little evidence of appropriate contracting

2 –

3 –

Demonstrates some ability to assess the client system adequately and some appropriateness in contracting

4 –

5 –

Demonstrates high ability in assessing the client system and in making appropriate contracts

1 –

Shows a limited relationship of design and implementation with the needs of the client system; learning is not visible

2 –

3 –

Shows some relationship of design and implementation with the needs of the client system and some learning occurring from that.

4 –

5 –

Shows high level of design and implementation of methods related to developmental needs of the client system; including program planning for optimal learning

1 –

Shows little or no ability to create an adequate working and learning relationship

2 –

3 –

Shows some ability to create an adequate working and learning relationship

4 –

5 –

Creates a cooperative and respectful working and learning relationship

1 –

Demonstrates little or no awareness of group dynamics in practice

2 –

3 –

Demonstrates some awareness of group dynamics in practice.

4 –

5 –

Demonstrates high awareness of group dynamics in practice and can name and conceptualize group process

1 –

Shows limited awareness of the impact of own interventions

2 –

3 –

Shows some awareness of the impact of own interventions

4 –

5 –

Shows high level of awareness of the impact of own interventions

1 –

Shows limited awareness of own professional practice and personal process and little relationship to ethical principles

2 –

3 –

Shows some awareness of own professional practice and personal process and some relationship to ethical principles

4 –

5 –

Shows high awareness of own professional practice and personal process and clearly relates to ethical principles

1 –

Shows little knowledge of organizational theories and approaches and limited ability to relate them to TA

2 –

3 –

Shows some knowledge of organizational theories and approaches with some ability to relate them to TA

4 –

5 –

Shows knowledge of organizational theories and approaches and the ability to relate them to TA

1 –

Professional level inappropriate

.

2 –

3 –

Some omission but good enough professional level

4 –

5 –

High professional level